Virtue ethics vs. utilitarianism Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Virtue ethics vs. utilitarianism - Term Paper ExampleIt is an ethical dilemma, to identify which of the two is ethical being rough or lying. On the other hand it is also complex if it is ethical or unethical for an undivided to steal from the rich with an aim of helping the poor. morality is both what an individual studies and thinks or the code that an individual follows and lives in that direction. In this paper I will argue that utilitarianism is the better form of ethics than right ethics.... Virtue ethics is a description of character as a moral agent, character is an ethical behavior driving force. It does not depend on rules or a consequence which defines what is right and wrong depending with the results of an act rather than character (Crisp, 68). While utilitarianism on the other hand, is an idea base on the moral worth of a specific action relaying on its usefulness as it maximizes on utility and minimizes on utility which is negative(Scarre, 2). Utility is defined as fun without pain, satisfaction that is preference or knowledge. Utilitarianism is therefore a form of consequentialism moral worth of a specific action depends on the outcome. ... ch therefore it does not case on the kind of acts man beings are involved in, or the intentions of individuals in an action, as long as the outcomes are positive. The consequential nuzzle makes sense to us intuitively since while growing up, most children are usually taught on how they should be good. In this context the young are usually advice on how they should contribute themselves and since human beings are mostly govern by there conscious they are in a position to make a decision based on the action that will not hate the other party (Lafollette, 27). In addition, utilitarianism relays on two main principles, oneness being equality that is an individual considers everyones interests counts by having the same weight and relevancy. It does not discriminate race since everyones frustrations or pa in has the same magnitude as anyone else. While the south principle relies on the action of an individual, the act has to result to a balance which is best between an individual frustrations and satisfaction, as well as to all human beings affected by the results of the action. It is the best form of ethic since as a utilitarian one has to think critically about a specific approach in a moral way. Here, an individual has to evaluate by first finding out the impacts of a specific approach. As a utilitarian one has to know who will be affected by choosing one of the two existing options. In addition, one has to determine the strength of the impact of the approach as well as where the best results will lie. It does not matter what option one has to take but it matters if the selected option is defines the moral duties (Lafollette, 27). On the other hand, Utilitarianism focuses on the idea of being kind and it is ethical for human beings to act this way. Being kind to